THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON TURKISH ECONOMY 2010-2016

  • Aliya Zhakanova Isiksal, Dr. Near East University, Faculty of Business and Administrative Sciences, Turkey
  • Husein Isiksal Near East University, Faculty of Business and Administrative Sciences
  • Hala Jalali Girne American University

Abstract

Tis study focuses on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows and how they are linked with the economic indicators in Turkey including the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER), and Gross Domestic Product per capita of Purchasing Power Parity - GDP (PPP) in Turkey. Te GDP (PPP) variable is used because it shows signifcant causality on REER, along with the exchange rate volatility of the U.S Dollar in the Turkish stock market. Also, as an important sector of the Turkish economy, tourism revenue is elucidated according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data from 2016.
Te main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the FDI investment on economic condition in Turkey for the period between January 2010 and July 2016. Te selected period is important because it represents the crucial time for Turkish economy following the 2008 global fnancial crisis along with the ongoing Civil War in neighboring Syria that had initiated in 2012, Turkish-Russian crises of 2015, and the military coup attempt in Turkey in 2016. It is argued that despite all the negative international and regional developments, FDI and Tourism play key roles in attracting income to the country. Tis is presented in the level of REER and GDP for PPP. Te results also support the fndings of many economists, who have previously asserted that the Turkish economic interaction is growing at a globalized level, and is able to compete with the other large attractive areas for foreign investors around the world. Finally, the results demonstrate that the tourism industry was the least affected sector in Turkey.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. ALFARO, L., A. CHANDA, Ö. S. KALEMLI, and S. SAYEK. FDI and Economic Growth: Te Role of Financial Markets. Harvard Business School. Working Paper 01-083, 2001.
2. ARSLANTÜRK, Y., and S. ATAN. “Dynamic Relation between Economic Growth, Foreign Exchange and Tourism Incomes. An Econometric Perspective on Turkey.” 1 (1), 2012: 30-37.
3. BİLGİLİ, F., N. S. H. TÜLÜCE, and İ. DOĞAN. “Te determinants of FDI in Turkey: A Markov regime-switching approach”. Economic Modeling, 29 (4), 2012: 1161-1169.
4. CENTRAL BANK OF REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (CBRT). Available at: Statistics.http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TCMB+EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/STATISTICS, September 15, 2017.
5. CÖMERT, H., and S. ÇOLAK, “Te Impacts of the Global Crisis on the Turkish Economy and Policy Responses.” Economic Research Center Working Papers in Economics, December 2014, Available at: http://www.erc.metu.edu.tr/menu/series14/1417.pdf, September 22, 2017.
6. CUSHMAN, D. O. “Real Exchange Rate Risk, Expectations, and the Level of Direct Investment”. Te MIT Press 67 (2), 1985: 297-308.
7. DAILY SABAH. Available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/economy/2017/07/25/foreigninvestment-in-turkey-up-112-pct-in-frst-5-months-of-2017, July 25, 2017.
8. DEMİR, F. “Exchange Rate Volatility and Employment Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from Turkey. Munich Personal RePEc World Development 38 (8). 2010: 20101127-1140.
9. DERVİŞ, K. Turkey and Europe. A New Perspective. In Aydın-Düzgit, S., A. Duncker, D. Huber, E. F. Keyman, and N. Tocci, (eds.) Global Turkey in Europe Political, Economic, and Foreign Policy Dimensions of Turkey’s Evolving Relationship with the EU. Roma: Edizioni Nuova Cultura, 2013: 201321-30.
10. DICKEY, D. A., and W. A. FULLER. “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49 (4) 1981: 1057-1072.
11. 11. DİNÇER, M. Z., F. I. DİNÇER, and M. USTAOGLU. “Reel Effective Exchange Rate Volatilities Impact on Tourism Sector in Turkey: An Empirical Analysis of 2003-2014”. Procedia Economics and Finance 23, 2015: 1000-1008.
12. EKİNCİ, A. “Financial Stress Index for Turkey”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 14 (2), 2013: 213-229.
13. ERDEM, F. H., and R. YAMAK. “Measuring the Optimal Macroeconomic Uncertainty Index for Turkey”. Economic Annals 61 (210), 2016: 7-22.
14. FINANCIAL TIMES. Available at: https://www.f.com/content/5e9fa63e-48d8-11e6-8d68-72e9211e86ab, September 1, 2017.
15. IŞIKSAL, H. “Turkish Foreign Policy During the AKP Era”. In Işıksal, H., and Örmeci, O. (eds.) Turkish Foreign Policy in the New Millennium. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2015: 15-28.
16. IŞIKSAL, H. “Turkish Foreign Policy, the Arab Spring and the Syrian Crisis: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back” In Işıksal, H., and Göksel, O. (eds.) Turkey’s Relations with the Middle East: Political Encounters after the Arab Spring. New York: Springer, 2017.
17. HYMER, S. On multinational corporations and foreign direct investment. The Theory of Transnational Corporations. London: Routledge, 1960.
18. IMF REPORT FOR SELECTED COUNTRIES AND SUBJECTS. IMF World Economic Outlook Database. August 2017.
19. KALYONCU, H. “New evidence of the validity of purchasing power parity from Turkey”. Applied Economic Letters 16 (1), 2009: 63-67.
20. KARA, H. “Turkey’s Experience with Macroprudential Policy. Macroprudential Policy: Effectiveness and Implementation Challenges.” CBRT-IMF-BIS Joint Conference October 26-27, İstanbul. 35-43. Accessed on March 30, 2017, Available at: http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/444c28b5-eeea-4b88-b8e3291642f89cfa/RemarksO28_10_2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE444c28b5-eeea-4b88-b8e3-291642f89cfa
21. KAYTAZ, M., and C. GÜL. “Consumer response to economic crisis and lessons for market: The Turkish experience”. Journal of Business Research, 67 (1): 2012: 2701-2706.
22. OECD DATA. https://data.oecd.org/ March 2016.
23. ÖZEN, E., C. ŞAHIN, and İ. ÜNALMIŞ. “External Financial Stress and External Financing Vulnerability in Turkey: Some Policy Implications for Financial Stability”. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey,13 (Special Issue-March) 2013: 65-74.
24. PESARAN, M. H., Y. SHIN, and R. P. SMITH. “Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94 (446), 1999: 621-634.
25. PHILLIPS, P. C., and P. PERRON. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75 (2), 1988: 335-346.
26. SÖNMEZ, M. “Cost of Russian crisis continues to rise”. Hurriyet Daily News, March 7, 2016. Available at: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/cost-of-russian-crisis-continues-to-rise. aspx?pageID=238&nID=96107&NewsCatID=344, September 21, 2017.
27. TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE. Available at: http://www.ofcialstatistics.gov.tr/?q=en/content/turkish-statistical-institute-turkstat, August 2016.
28. UNCTAD (UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT) WORLD INVESTMENT REPORT 2017. Geneva: United Nations Publications. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2017_en.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2017.
29. UNITED NATIONS REFUGEE AGENCY REPORT 2015. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/fgures-at-a-glance.html. Accessed March 23, 2017.
30. YALCIN, E., and K. KİRİŞCİ. “GED Briefng: Turkey at crossroad. Economic Perspectives on a Country in Turbulence”. Washington DC. 2017.
Published
2017-12-29
How to Cite
ZHAKANOVA ISIKSAL, Aliya; ISIKSAL, Husein; JALALI, Hala. THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON TURKISH ECONOMY 2010-2016. ECONOMICS - Innovation and economic research, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 69-81, dec. 2017. ISSN 2303-5013. Available at: <http://economicsrs.com/index.php/economicus/article/view/124>. Date accessed: 22 feb. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/eoik-2017-0019.
Section
Original scientific paper