HYBRID MCDM SOLUTIONS FOR EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX OF THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Amar Mešić University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Smiljka Miškić University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Željko Stević University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Zoran Mastilo University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Business Economics, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2022-0004

Keywords:

Logistics Performance Index (LPI), MCDM model, CRITIC, MARCOS

Abstract

The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) performed by the World Bank is an indicator of the logistics environment quality of a country in which logistics operators act. The LPI is an interactive tool designed to help countries identify challenges, innovative solutions, and opportunities they face in their work in the field of trade and logistics. The aim of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis and ranking of the LPI of the countries in the Western Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Albania, Serbia and Montenegro), calculated by the World Bank for 2018, using an integrated Criteria Importance Trough Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) model and thus show the real picture of the logistics environment. In order to determine the performance of countries and show the overall logistics performance, six key dimensions are used: customs, infrastructure, international transport, logistics capability, tracking and tracing of goods and shipment delivery within scheduled or expected times. Using the CRITIC method, the weight values of the previously mentioned six criteria were calculated, whereby the criterion related to shipment delivery within scheduled times was singled out as the most significant criterion. Then, by applying the MARCOS method, the countries of the Western Balkans were ranked on the basis of the six defined criteria. Based on the results obtained, the best-ranked country is Serbia. The analysis of the sensitivity of the results to changes in the significance of the criteria does not show significant changes in the ranking.

References

Arvis, J. F., Alina Mustra, M., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., & Saslavsky, D. (2010). Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy-The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/24599

Arvis, J. F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., & Raj, A. (2016). Trade logistics in the global economy: the logistics performance index and its indicators. The report was designed, edited, and typeset by Communications Development Incorporated, Washington, DC.

Aydogan, E. K. (2011). Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the roughAHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment.Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3992-3998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.060

Bottani, E., Montanari, R., Rinaldi, M., & Vignali, G. (2015). Modeling and multi-objective optimization of closed loop supply chains: A case study.Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 328-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.009

Çakır, S. (2017). Measuring logistics performance of OECD countries via fuzzy linear regression. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3-4), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1601

Daniel Saslavsky & Ben Shepherd (2014). Facilitating international production networks: The role of trade logistics, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 23(7), 979-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2013.811534

D’Aleo, V. and Sergi, B.S. (2017), “Does logistics influence economic growth? The European experience”, Management Decision, 55 (8), 1613-1628. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2016-0670

Devlin, J., & Yee, P. (2005). Trade logistics in developing countries: The case of the Middle East and North Africa. World Economy, 28(3), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00620.x

Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

Isik, O., Aydin, Y., & Kosaroglu, S. M. (2020). The assessment of the logistics Performance Index of CEE Countries with the New Combination of SV and MABAC Methods. LogForum, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.504

Jhawar, A., Garg, S. K., & Khera, S. N. (2017). Improving logistics performance through investments and policy intervention: a causal loop model. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 20(3), 363-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.10003289

Kisa, A. C. G., & Ayçin, E. (2019). OECD ülkelerinin lojistik performanslarının SWARA tabanlı EDAS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.500320

Korinek, J. and P. Sourdin (2011), “To What Extent Are High-Quality Logistics Services Trade Facilitating?”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 108, OECD Publishing, Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873

Martí, L., Puertas, R., & García, L. (2014). The importance of the Logistics Performance Index in international trade. Applied economics, 46(24), 2982-2992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.916394

Martí, L., Martín, J. C., & Puertas, R. (2017). A DEA-logistics performance index. Journal of applied economics, 20(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(17)30008-9

Najmi, A., & Makui, A. (2010). Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.008

Oğuz, S., Alkan, G., & Yılmaz, B. (2019). Seçilmiş Asya ülkelerinin lojistik performanslarının TOPSİS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,(Özel Sayı), 497, 507. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.613421

Ojala, L., & Celebi, D. (2015). The World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and drivers of logistics performance. Proceeding of MAC-EMM, OECD.

Ozmen, M. (2019). Logistics competitiveness of OECD countries using an improved TODIM method. Sādhanā, 44(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1088-y

Özceylan, E., Çetinkaya, C., Erbaş, M., & Kabak, M. (2016). Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.020

Patricija, B., & Tuljak-Suban, D. (2020). Most Frequently used Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models in Logistic Service Provider selection: A Comparative Performance Analysis of a Real Case Study. International Scientific Conference THE SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT TRANSFORMATION OF TRANSPORTATION 29 th – 30 th September, ON-LINE CONFERENCE

Popescu, A., & Sipos, C. (2014). Logistics Performance and Economic Development-A Comparison within the European Union. Proceedings of “MAC-EMM”.-Prague, Czech Republic, 1-9.

Rouse, P., & Putterill, M. (2003). An integral framework for performance measurement. Management Decision, 41(8), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310496305

Sénquiz-Díaz, C. (2021a). Transport infrastructure quality and logistics performance in exports. Economics-Innovative and Economic Research, 9(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2021-0008

Sénquiz-Díaz,C.(2021b). Effect Size of Logistics: Evidence from Selected Countries. LOGI – Scientifc Journal on Transport and Logistics,12(1) 123-134. https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2021-0012

Sénquiz-Díaz,C.(2021c). The Effect of Transport and Logistics on Trade Facilitation and Trade: A PLS-SEM Approach. ECONOMICS,9(2) 11-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2021-0021

Shepherd, B. (2013). Aid for Trade and value Chains in Transport and Logistics. WTO/OECD.

Stević, Ž., & Brković, N. (2020). A novel integrated FUCOM-MARCOS model for evaluation of human resources in a transport company. Logistics, 4(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics4010004

Stević Ž., Pamučar. D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to Compromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231

Ulutaş, A., & Karaköy, Ç. (2019). An analysis of the logistics performance index of EU countries with an integrated MCDM model 1. Economics and Business Review, 5(4), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.4.3

Yu, M. M., & Hsiao, B. (2016). Measuring the technology gap and logistics performance of individual countries by using a meta-DEA–AR model. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(1), 98-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1037372

Yildirim, B. F., & Adiguzel Mercangoz, B. (2020). Evaluating the logistics performance of OECD countries by using fuzzy AHP and ARAS-G. Eurasian Economic Review, 10(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-019-00131-3

https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/fles/International_LPI_from_2007_to_2018.xlsx Accesed 25.02.2022.

https://lpi.worldbank.org/ Accesed 20.02.2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Mešić, A. ., Miškić, S. ., Stević, Željko ., & Mastilo, Z. . (2022). HYBRID MCDM SOLUTIONS FOR EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX OF THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES . ECONOMICS - INNOVATIVE AND RESEARCH JOURNAL, 10(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2022-0004