REFORMS OF THE COMMUNITY AGRARIAN POLICY: MISCONCEPTION OR NEW AGRICULTURAL ARCHITECTURE?

Authors

  • Boris Spasojević Catering, Trade and Tourism Vocational School, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Aleksandar Đukić Catering, Trade and Tourism Vocational School, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Dragan Stanković Republic Administration for Geodetic and Property Affairs of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/eoik-2017-0024

Keywords:

Community Agrarian Policy, European Union, reforms, goals of the CAP, agriculture

Abstract

The European Union is the most complex and by any aspect the most unique example of a regional economic integration. Its origin, evolution and survival are based on a common legislative and institutional framework. The so-called common policies implemented in a number of economic and non-economic areas are particularly distinctive. Most of them are implemented on two levels: national and communal. The only common policy that is fully implemented at the European Union level is the Community Agrarian Policy (CAP), whereas the agriculture has the highest expenditure in the communal budget. The function of CAP is primarily economic as its goals are strictly related to economic issues: price stability of agricultural products, productivity growth, higher wages for the farmers, etc. The CAP strengthens the Union’s social cohesion, which is of utmost importance in times of constant crises, BREXIT and other extreme instabilities. For this reason, the CAP has been in the processes of continuous reforms (MacShary, Mansholt and those of recent times) for decades, in order to increase its efficiency and justify enormous financial investments. The CAP results depend on the achievement of preset objectives and the exchange of agricultural products and food that the European Union generates globally. It has been demonstrated that the CAP is a significant common policy, both in achieving economic goals and in the sphere of strengthening communal cohesion.

References

Barnes, P. i Barnes,G.(1999).Environmental policy in the European Union. Edward Elgar Pub, UK.

European Commission (2000). From the Single Act to Maastricht and Beyond: the Means to mach our Ambitions. Downloaded on 15 October 2017. from https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/commission_communication_from_the_single_act_to_maastricht_and_beyond_the_means_to_match_our_ambitions_11_february_1992-en-ff61d9a6-7b3f-4153-8ba1-451af0476e28.html

Mikuš, O., Franić, R. i Ramani, D.(2013). Smjernice zajedničke poljoprivredne politike Europske unije nakon 2013 (eng. Guidelines of the Community Agrarian Policy of the European Union after 2013). Agronomic Gazette, Zagreb.

Plumb, H.(1996). The Cork Declaration – A Living Countryside, Rural Europe – Future

perspectives. Cork, Ireland.

Popović, G. (2016). Ekonomija Evropske unije (eng. Economics of the European Union). Institute for textbooks and teaching aids, East Sarajevo.

Popović, G., Zakić, Z. and Stojanović, Ž.(2009). Savremena ruralna politika (eng. Contemporary Rural Politics), Faculty of Economics, University in Banja Luka.

Eurostat (2013). Overview of CAP Reform 2014-2020. Downloaded on 15 October 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf

Zakić, Z. and Stojanović, Ž. (2008). Ekonomika agrara (Economics of Agriculture). Faculty of Economics, Belgrade.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

Spasojević, B. ., Đukić, A. ., & Stanković, D. . (2017). REFORMS OF THE COMMUNITY AGRARIAN POLICY: MISCONCEPTION OR NEW AGRICULTURAL ARCHITECTURE?. ECONOMICS - INNOVATIVE AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 5(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/eoik-2017-0024